Keko55

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoN_6pJtKc

Hopefully this car model: Proton IRIZ R5...

Dirt 4 I like it in asphalt much more than DR. Also in RX mode, Buggies, Truck, etc, The wet asphalt also feels excellent. The category R5, if it behaves very well on the different surfaces. When braking, inertia, weight... mechanical traction.. it feels better in Dirt 4 in the category R5. Those who have played it already, how's it going the Audi group b ? I'm sorry my English. Use the translator of google. 

Hoping to see again the wonderful Hyundai i20 R5, ohhhh 

Do you tire of asphalt will use the Golf gti fwd?

¿When do you think that began to develop Dirt Rally 2.0? ¿What they decided to see the bad reception of Dirt 4? 

Buggies RWD Dirt 4, interestingly yes that behaved as you would expect from a RWD... 

¿What new car you think that you will? It would be good and the Citroen BX Group B... 

In many of the videos revolve very rough and aggressive and the car responds in that way. In my opinion.

Tour as in Dirt Rally 2.0.Both the angle of the front wheels as in the side-scrolling... 

¿What cars of the Group B will touch us this time?   <3 <3

A car race should be easy to drive "quiet", in change, the difficulty should reside in to drive fast and do a better time... to take risks. The Dirt series does that VERY well. It is not realistic low speed driving and have a thousand setbacks. That does not make a game more real... Just unpredictable. That is not the same.Who is would go up to a car unpredictable? 

That would be awesome that Porsche RWD. And the heavenly sound to which we are accustomed to CM. 

The Porsche is RWD. And we will see as you drive with the engine over the rear axle... 

¿What role do you play the Chevrolet Camaro GTR.4 in Dirt Rally 2.0?

Does Dirt 2 not already had the call <<deformation field>>? Very happy with the cars of category R5, where we will see the Polo GTI. And by the way: it's amazing that finally we have the brand Porsche, and no one says anything. ¿What we will also see Skoda R5? With the geniuses that are CM with the sounds of cars, will have to see as it sounds like this Porsche. 

probably not, even if they were in the game they would break down long before they got to the start line ¿Do not you get confused with Alfa Romeo? 

¿Will Saab be in this Dirt Rally 2.0? Mmmmm... 

Polonia  <3

Where to see the ad, here? I have no idea where to see the event ...

Spain also awaits news of the new CM game ...  <3 <3 <3

4x4 físico de Dirt 4, RWD físico de Dirt Rally ... Pero la mejora evidente de una nueva entrega. The mechanical grip on forks of the R5 category is more realistic in Dirt 4 ... Braking and inertia as well. In my opinion.

LittleApple dijo: Preferí la física de Dirt 4 a Dirt Rallys. Una vez aprendí cómo sintonizar los problemas obvios de los autos. (especialmente alrededor del diferencial) La configuración básica de la diferencia y las explicaciones no se explicaron claramente en el menú de configuración. Sospecho que la desinformación y las configuraciones conservadoras de la base llevaron a que las configuraciones de las personas fueran contrarias a lo que estaban esperando y afectando a la física. The R5 category, for me, is better than Dirt Rally ...

¡Go, go, go, codies!  :D :D  Hopefully they put tire wear, mixed sections (asphalt and gravel ...) Toyota  <3

People mistook difficulty for realism, yes it was a pretty good sim especially for when it was released but the handling was pretty basic by today's standards and the car had the same amount of grip at low or high speeds and there was no detail. DR got a lot of stuff right and needed some things working on which I'm sure has been done and this could well be the best rally game to date. Unless its DiRT Showdown 2 in which case I shall quit the forum and never come back. So what did people do in case of Dirt Rally, mistook lack of difficulty for realism? Because after playing any sim dirt feels easy. Also I'm not sure about the code, but handling in Dirt Rally is more basic than RBR,  RBR is not perfect, maybe not precise, but it is the only game that has the qualities of a sim. I am talking about the careful manipulation of the weight balance of the car, changes of grip, many ways of throwing the car around.   Ok.  I like RBR.  It’s a classic.  But anyone who claims it to be simulation, as clearly never driven a car fast, let alone driven a rally car fast. RBR was good for what it was but it was basic and did really basic things to pass off as a driving simulation. DiRT didn’t need to be difficult.  Driving a rally car isn’t difficult.  It’s ultra-intuitive.  If it’s not, your in a bad car. It’s the being consistently fast, consistently accurate and gaining the very last few tenths of a second over the length of a 15 mile stage that’s difficult about rallying. RBR was difficult and people mistook that difficulty for realism, to the point that they think everything else to be ‘too easy’.  It was difficult because it was vague.   DiRT Rally has levels of driver detail and driver feedback that blew RBR into the history books where it now belongs.   The only thing that was easy about DiRT Rally, was the width of stages.  Sweden addressed that beautifully, and everyone cries that Sweden is ‘too hard’.... Lol That's why at the RBR driving school, you could watch a thousand videos, but they were ALL the same fruit of canned driving ... If I had to settle this question in just one sentence I would say: "So that a car game can be played the luxury of being called Simulator must at least allow to reproduce any possible driving style ".... and Dirt Rally allows it ... RBR NOOOOO !!