Jump to content
Christmas Period - Codemasters Staff and Support Read more... ×

GoldenColt

Members
  • Content Count

    1,695
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GoldenColt


  1. Wodka Gorbatschow Grand Prix | Qualifying

    1. Hamilton - 5
    2. Rosberg - 5
    3. Bottas - 5

    Wodka Puschkin Grand Prix | Race

    1. Hamilton - 15
    2. Rosberg - 15
    3. Bottas - 15 (+Bonus 30)
    4. Massa - 0
    5. Magnussen - 15
    6. Button - 3
    7. Alonso - 8
    8. Kvyat - 0
    9. Vergne - 0
    10. Hülkenberg - 3

    Honorary mentions to Vladimir Putin as he would lap them all bare-chested on a north-caucasian horse while hunting down two bears and flirting with Alonsos GF.
    119 Points, wohoo!!

  2. APR193 said:
    Anybody else think the circuit is kinda boring and uninteresting? It's basically Abu Dhabi mixed with Singapore, it has no real identity or stand-out features.

    Also, even though on a lot of other websites people are commenting that Marussia should have run a second car, I think they've made the right decision in only racing one car this  weekend.
    A new F1 track that is boring, uninteresting and lacks any sort of character? Never heard that before.....oh wait, yes I have


  3. Wodka Gorbatschow Grand Prix | Qualifying

    1. Hamilton
    2. Rosberg
    3. Bottas

    Wodka Puschkin Grand Prix | Race

    1. Hamilton
    2. Rosberg
    3. Bottas
    4. Massa
    5. Magnussen
    6. Button
    7. Alonso
    8. Kvyat
    9. Vergne
    10. Hülkenberg

    Honorary mentions to Vladimir Putin as he would lap them all bare-chested on a north-caucasian horse while hunting down two bears and flirting with Alonsos GF.

  4. I would sue this scumbag for defamation. Or anything that comes close to that in International Law.
    While I agree this guy is scum. If international defamation law is anything like US defamation law, defamation isn't gonna work mostly because the comment is only false and not defamatory. Plus since Jules is a public figure there needs to be actual damages stemming from the alleged defamatory remark... which there isn't. Also it's written implying libel which has whole other issues regarding the outlet (Twitter). My torts professor would be so proud.
    Hence why I said "anything that comes close". I only know austrian law and over here defamation can be interpreted in a wider range, if you get what I mean.

    But I agree, defamation isn't the right word for this. Guess I let my anger take over control for a moment.
    No I completely understand... I don't know what law would even apply (jurisdictionaly speaking) let alone what that law even says. I agree that he shouldn't just be able to spout bull$#&% without some consequence. Hopefully enough people will realize he has no idea what he's talking about and stop following/listening to him.
    Where I live it is illegal to spread rumours about people as long as these rumours interfere with their personality rights. But it's tough to find a proper regulation for that. It would be a hell of a lot easier if he had just called Jules names.

    Anyway, sorry for the off-topic. It's just another legal loophole for utter morons in our quickly developing world which needs to be fixed imo.

  5. I would sue this scumbag for defamation. Or anything that comes close to that in International Law.
    While I agree this guy is scum. If international defamation law is anything like US defamation law, defamation isn't gonna work mostly because the comment is only false and not defamatory. Plus since Jules is a public figure there needs to be actual damages stemming from the alleged defamatory remark... which there isn't. Also it's written implying libel which has whole other issues regarding the outlet (Twitter). My torts professor would be so proud.
    Hence why I said "anything that comes close". I only know austrian law and over here defamation can be interpreted in a wider range, if you get what I mean.

    But I agree, defamation isn't the right word for this. Guess I let my anger take over control for a moment.
×