-
Content Count
1,695 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by GoldenColt
-
-
You forgot the bonus 30 points for predicting the top 3 perfectly.AMS97KRR said:
Surely that is 99 points?afrodude41 said:
129 points, another strong round :)afrodude41 said:Quali
1. Hamilton - 5
2. Rosberg - 5
3. Bottas - 5
Race
1. Hamilton - 15
2. Rosberg - 15
3. Bottas - 15
4. Button - 15
5. Alonso - 8
6. Magnussen - 8
7. Massa - 0
8. Kvyat - 0
9. Vettel - 8
10. Vergne - 0
I got it aswell. :D
-
119 Points, wohoo!!GoldenColt said:Wodka Gorbatschow Grand Prix | Qualifying
1. Hamilton - 5
2. Rosberg - 5
3. Bottas - 5
Wodka Puschkin Grand Prix | Race
1. Hamilton - 15
2. Rosberg - 15
3. Bottas - 15 (+Bonus 30)
4. Massa - 0
5. Magnussen - 15
6. Button - 3
7. Alonso - 8
8. Kvyat - 0
9. Vergne - 0
10. Hülkenberg - 3
Honorary mentions to Vladimir Putin as he would lap them all bare-chested on a north-caucasian horse while hunting down two bears and flirting with Alonsos GF.
-
Sure. I was afraid Marc would cut himself with that sword. :P
-
Well deserved win for Lorenzo and well deserved 2nd championship for Marquez. Never in doubt.
-
-
Full points! Booya!
-
-
APR193 said:
A new F1 track that is boring, uninteresting and lacks any sort of character? Never heard that before.....oh wait, yes I haveRevolvingPrawn said:Anybody else think the circuit is kinda boring and uninteresting? It's basically Abu Dhabi mixed with Singapore, it has no real identity or stand-out features.
Also, even though on a lot of other websites people are commenting that Marussia should have run a second car, I think they've made the right decision in only racing one car this weekend.
-
Wodka Gorbatschow Grand Prix | Qualifying
1. Hamilton
2. Rosberg
3. Bottas
Wodka Puschkin Grand Prix | Race
1. Hamilton
2. Rosberg
3. Bottas
4. Massa
5. Magnussen
6. Button
7. Alonso
8. Kvyat
9. Vergne
10. Hülkenberg
Honorary mentions to Vladimir Putin as he would lap them all bare-chested on a north-caucasian horse while hunting down two bears and flirting with Alonsos GF.
-
-
General Knowledge 1: 40/40
-
garyjpaterson said:Is this a credible site for f1 news? If so, looks like Hamilton is going back to McLaren!
http://www.f1today.net/en/news/hamilton-signs-for-mclaren-for-2015
-
Logo 1: 21/36
Logo 2: 20/36
Logo 3: 20/36
-
Logo: 21/36
Songs: 19/42
-
Finally in the top ten.
-
Where I live it is illegal to spread rumours about people as long as these rumours interfere with their personality rights. But it's tough to find a proper regulation for that. It would be a hell of a lot easier if he had just called Jules names.Chadwick8505 said:
No I completely understand... I don't know what law would even apply (jurisdictionaly speaking) let alone what that law even says. I agree that he shouldn't just be able to spout bull$#&% without some consequence. Hopefully enough people will realize he has no idea what he's talking about and stop following/listening to him.GoldenColt said:
Hence why I said "anything that comes close". I only know austrian law and over here defamation can be interpreted in a wider range, if you get what I mean.Chadwick8505 said:
While I agree this guy is scum. If international defamation law is anything like US defamation law, defamation isn't gonna work mostly because the comment is only false and not defamatory. Plus since Jules is a public figure there needs to be actual damages stemming from the alleged defamatory remark... which there isn't. Also it's written implying libel which has whole other issues regarding the outlet (Twitter). My torts professor would be so proud.GoldenColt said:I would sue this scumbag for defamation. Or anything that comes close to that in International Law.
But I agree, defamation isn't the right word for this. Guess I let my anger take over control for a moment.
Anyway, sorry for the off-topic. It's just another legal loophole for utter morons in our quickly developing world which needs to be fixed imo.
-
Hence why I said "anything that comes close". I only know austrian law and over here defamation can be interpreted in a wider range, if you get what I mean.Chadwick8505 said:
While I agree this guy is scum. If international defamation law is anything like US defamation law, defamation isn't gonna work mostly because the comment is only false and not defamatory. Plus since Jules is a public figure there needs to be actual damages stemming from the alleged defamatory remark... which there isn't. Also it's written implying libel which has whole other issues regarding the outlet (Twitter). My torts professor would be so proud.GoldenColt said:I would sue this scumbag for defamation. Or anything that comes close to that in International Law.
But I agree, defamation isn't the right word for this. Guess I let my anger take over control for a moment.
-
I would sue this scumbag for defamation. Or anything that comes close to that in International Law.
-
-
Looks hideous imo.
And it's not an F1-car anymore to me.
-
As if closed cockpits would have made this Bianchi-situation any better.
-
82 on football, not too bad.
How did I miss Cole?
-
-
Ok, I've seen the footage from another user now.
He went straight into the crane, head on. How he even survived that is beyond me.

F1 2014 Russian Grand Prix @ Sochi
in World of Motorsport
Posted