Jump to content Jump to content

bn880

Members
  • Content Count

    710
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bn880

  1. 25.12.2020: Version 1.7 is out. New: Support added for DR 2.0 Ford Fiesta R5 MKII Support added for DR 2.0 Peugeot 206 Rally Support added for DR 2.0 Subaru Impreza S4 Rally Support added for DR 2.0 Subaru Impreza (2001) Support added for DR 2.0 Seat Ibiza Kitcar Support added for DR 2.0 Volkswagen Golf Kitcar That should be all the vehicles and stages/tracks in DR2.0 to date. Merry Christmas/Happy Festivus 03.07.2020: Version 1.6 is out. New: Support added for DR
  2. That's the way I also see it, I can't imagine someone winning Masters at least in R2 that I am in without really memorizing most of the stages or generating their own pacenotes. The AI are doing consistent hammered time trial record times or beyond. Not rally times even of the best drivers in the world IMO. Edit: But Codies are looking into it, so we will see what they decide on the issue etc.
  3. Well yes they tested it, the issue is that they used the fastest Virtual Rally driver to test it! (Jon) 😛 (I thought it was kinda funny, it's Monday, give me a break)
  4. It's the reverse actually in the WRC, the leader always opens the road on the thursday/friday. Then whoever is slowest from that day opens the road on Saturday. (it's all kinds of ****, but that's another discussion) Also it is divided into classes, support series run after the main WR cars.
  5. No it doesn't. You're entering different information then. Please share your eye distance to screen and your screen height.
  6. With all due respect, Mike likely said that because the vFOV /camera isn't changed from DR1 to DR2 and that calculator was correct for DR1. However how you use the value from Dr1 to DR2 has changed as you aren't entering it in a config. So, don't hang on to what CM said, you don't really even need them as part of this conversation once you got your FOV click values as we have, because you can use geometry and physics/optical calculations to check everything. Stop for a minute thinking of what people tell you, and use your own brain as it were to consider whether what you see in the frame
  7. It's not showing correct values for vFOV for DR 2.0. All you have to do is check how wide the road is on your monitor versus in your real car... its so blatantly obvious it's not funny.
  8. No - The calculator is totally right. You are using a double FOV from what it should be with the other calculators. If you can't play, raise it knowing it's not realistic, or upgrade your setup.
  9. https://andyf.me/fovcalc.html now has DR 2.0 output.
  10. Even Jon is quite a bit behind the AI as I found out by chance yesterday, these are times from one stage of New England:
  11. @CarlesWRC I guess you must suck more to get bumped down, go to each event and retire. Or you could do a full reset of the myTeam thing... which might suck.
  12. Just an update on this, because now I can view the Career Leaderboard. R2 Masters: I am regularly placing top 10 or top 5 in Spain and NE stages on the leaderboards, in the wet often #1 or 2, and I am still placing around 10th versus the AI. Edit: To clarify, on the human Career Leader boards the people at the top 10 usually are not the same people, it's a huge inconsistency. Versus the Ai where the top 3 at an even are generally the top 3 in most stages. So while I am about 5 places average higher or more versus the humans, the AI are also much more consistent. So this is a pr
  13. Well that's exactly what it is, it's just doubling it. So you have a calculator basically on the immersion site, use any other game that has vFOV like Assetto Corsa and you have the right answer that's not doubled. Then you can use the -5 / +3 table someone posted above to know how many clicks up or down from center you need to adjust (hint, almost everyone needs to do some negative clicks, and most people need to go to smallest FOV possible)
  14. Another example of crazy R2 AI times, this is Masters level. masters AI dry, ~130th on the road (degraded) Humans, dry, ideal degradation So they are beating the Human world record done in ideal conditions by 7 seconds in Australia. And they do this with degradation, and worn tyres.
  15. Yes you will get dropped eventually if you keep finishing at the bottom or Abandon a championship a few times. I'm kind of hoping CM will fix the AI times, it's a bit scary in the R2's on some events.
  16. It's just going to be an algorithm with some inputs like Level, Class, Conditions, ideal time, etc. Obviously the algorithm is a bit mis configured.
  17. The AI times in R2 ARE quite messed up, Marynka. I can do a 4:15 with a few tiny errors in the dry, that's 11th world time. but that's not good for Masters Career AI, they do the same time in the wet, with full degradation: Humans Dry no deg AI Wet full deg back of field Video of the Dry stage for reference
  18. Oh, I think they did pretty well on that aspect; because often you're in lower levels up against "up and coming talent", and yeah they're fast but next season they usually are already in a higher level and not there to challenge you anymore. This can happen in real life too where a driver is just so much better but he won't stay there long.
  19. I am resorting to restarting my wet stages until I can minimize the time loss in R2 FWD career. It's really not a good experience as I am pretty hardcore (tm) and would prefer to do no restarts as I was able to do until I got into elite. Frankly without restarts with these AI times especially in the wet, I'd probably struggle for 2 years to get into Masters. 😄
  20. Well, you should try completing the Career in Elite using R2 FWD class then... 😛 and make sure it rains a lot to top it off. I feel like I am qualifying for the e sports championship or something doing that. lol
  21. Any way to swap a default livery to another one in DR 2.0? I started a championship with a silly sun strip down half my windshield and wanted to fix it. 😄
  22. Oh sure, blame the tester. 😛 I prefer to blame the upper management fur such large debacles. 😄
  23. Hehe, It seems like this is probably the best system, as long as there is a process people understand and can follow. (at least until AI is crazy good to judge such things)
×
×
  • Create New...