Jump to content Jump to content

DiRTy Gossip


MastaVonBlasta
 Share

Go to solution Solved by PJTierney,
Message added by PJTierney,

Did you know that the long-time members of this thread have had a DiRTy Gossip Discord server for a while?

You do now 😉 

 

 

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, dgeesi0 said:

i think the thing is not to get confused with is wanting all cars in same class to drive the same ! its not drive the same. characteristics need to be realistic . just the time differences balanced. no one wants every car to drive the same. that would make for a boring game. as it sits currently for eg its just pick the quickest car in the class. go. making the others in the same class irrelevant. so 50 cars total for eg yet only 10 are driven because of the time differences. which makes 90 percent of the cars in dirt pointless. which is a shame.

I understand your point and partially agree with it, but i think realistic characteristics and balanced time differences are mutually exclusive options, ie, you can't have both at the same time... that brings us to the 2 approches PJ talked, realistic cars OR balanced cars.

Edited by Opassac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dgeesi0 said:

i think the thing is not to get confused with is wanting all cars in same class to drive the same ! its not drive the same. characteristics need to be realistic . just the time differences balanced. no one wants every car to drive the same. that would make for a boring game. as it sits currently for eg its just pick the quickest car in the class. go. making the others in the same class irrelevant. so 50 cars total for eg yet only 10 are driven because of the time differences. which makes 90 percent of the cars in dirt pointless. which is a shame.

Exactly, we want quirky and unique cars but we also want a way to make the quirky cars actually viable to drive in some scenarios.

I think the absolute BEST solution, on top of white/black lists for clubs, is to find a way to really cement their strengths and weaknesses. I don't mind any car being significantly faster than the rest at (as an example) Monte Carlo, but that car should also then struggle at other locations and be slower. Yes I'm generalizing and gameifying things, but this is how they actually worked in real life.

Think of the classic 037 and Quattro battles - 037 ran away on tarmac and heavier gravel, but the Quattro dominated in bad conditions and the really loose stuff. So if someone sets up a Germany & Spain 2 event championship, I expect the Quattro to get stomped on. But if someone sets up a Germany - Spain - Sweden - Wales - Australia 5 event champ, I would hope the 037 pulls ahead early and the Quattro can naturally claw its way back in the final 3 rallies.

I have no idea how to exactly implement this in game, but I think that idea should at least be a general guiding principle to class design. We don't want standardized and equal cars, we want a competitive class across a championship. Trying to balance location by location would create more problems than it'd fix, but trying to balance the overall time/strengths/weaknesses over an entire championship seems more doable to me.

Edited by Mike Dee
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mike Dee said:

Exactly, we want quirky and unique cars but we also want a way to make the quirky cars actually viable to drive in some scenarios.

I think the absolute BEST solution, on top of white/black lists for clubs, is to find a way to really cement their strengths and weaknesses. I don't mind any car being significantly faster than the rest at (as an example) Monte Carlo, but that car should also then struggle at other locations and be slower. Yes I'm generalizing and gameifying things, but this is how they actually worked in real life.

Think of the classic 037 and Quattro battles - 037 ran away on tarmac and heavier gravel, but the Quattro dominated in bad conditions and the really loose stuff.

I have no idea how to exactly implement this in game, but I think that idea should at least be a general guiding principle to class design. We don't want standardized and equal cars, we want a competitive class across a championship. Trying to balance location by location would create more problems than it'd fix, but trying to balance the overall time/strengths/weaknesses over an entire championship seems more doable to me.

The quattro/037 battle would be great to see and it's doable with multiclass clubs... But there are cars wich are slower in real life in every conditions, and, again in my opinion, they should stay the same in the game... i wouldn't want to see the citroen DS be as fast as the mini just for the sake of balance.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having car X vs car Y struggle in another location doesn't solve the "balance" issue per say, and is another layer of complexity that existed to an extent IRL.  The reason is not every rally/run consists of multiple events that would balance things.  Also things did not completely balance out IRL with dominant cars between events either.   So I think sticking with the black/white list solution, and if time permits a ballast/restrictor solution for eSports to better show off the game is probably the way to go.   I disagree with DG on forcing vehicles to do basically the same times overall, unless it's a specific option chosen for a championship or eSports event. 

Even now in the car restricted dailies the problem of dominance magically disappears, that's white listing at play.  I'm quite sure if there was a way to black/white list we wouldn't only get Citroen 2000CC and Lancia Delta club events, but instead the slower cars would get used.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Opassac said:

But there are cars wich are slower in real life in every conditions,

Oh you are 100% right and in those scenarios we need car lists for clubs specifically to deal with that. We can't fix everything, some cars from the very beginning of a rally generation are obviously going to be slower than the last few cars of that generation - that is literally the point of them evolving and new models being built. But I think there is definitely room within the classes themselves to craft a more competitive, back-and-forth style experience from these cars.

Maybe you don't go for the different location strengths/weaknesses and instead go for the performance/durability approach where powerful cars are more fragile. There are ways to gameify this correctly to be fun while still letting the cars be themselves. Just a balancing act on a very fine line.

3 minutes ago, bn880 said:

The reason is not every rally/run consists of multiple events that would balance things. 

And that is completely OK. It isn't a perfect solution, but wasn't meant to be either. I think it's a decent idea when picturing the grand scope of things because you can't really try to balance the performance of all championship combos, especially less common ones (in DR2) like all tarmac champs.

I think we all agree the black/white list is pretty much mandatory going into any future games. BOP is an interesting idea, but it really only feels applicable to eSports. Majority of drivers may be competitive, but they aren't "let's go face off against Joona and Micky" competitive so I think focusing on completely leveling the playing field with ballasts/restrictors only solves a very narrow channel of the problem.

BN you know as well as I do we can take basically any car from any class and make it HIGHLY competitive against 95% of drivers - and this reason right here is why I don't see ballast helping that much. Below top tier racing, the limitations aren't the vehicles it is the driver 9 times out of 10. Now if they are going to give club directors full ballast/restrictor control too so they can modify them on a championship basis, that could be a completely different and cool thing to add.

Edited by Mike Dee
  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not so much of making the cars times identical its so they are close enough to make it competitive in the classes they in. some cars in dirt rally games are almost the same as one or two classes up times wize in the same class. lancia delta for eg. can win stages 10 secs plus any car in its own class. shouldnt really be that big a gap. especially in similar specced cars. in the same class.

Edited by dgeesi0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mike Dee said:

so I think focusing on completely leveling the playing field with ballasts/restrictors only solves a very narrow channel of the problem

 

I agree with most of your post, and yes the ballast or restrictor would be very specific and have a narrow but perhaps necessary application.   Overall I believe in the last couple days, we are all in agreement except perhaps DG.  (class freedom/black/white list solves most issues, resolve narrow remaining issues with other means)

 

@dgeesi0 I think making the times artificially close is not much better than artificially identical for the sake of this argument.  It is Ok only in very specific scenarios in my opinion.  I wouldn't want to see the cars permanently affected like this.   no offense, and I realize you have a right to your POV.

Edited by bn880
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my opinion is mine doesnt mean its right. just would prefer closer competition in car classes than what currently is. most of my fav cars have no chance of posting the top times because of it. so you end up driving faster cars just for the time differences. its great to see other peoples thoughts on this . :classic_cool:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bn880 said:

but perhaps necessary application.

Oh definitely a necessary thing IMO even if some don't like the idea. I don't want it applied to 90% of the game honestly, but where it does serve a purpose it solves a MASSIVE issue - well massive to me. I want to see variety, I want to see individual driver preferences for certain car characteristics shine through, and ballasts/restricts fix perfectly.

I think DG is even in agreement for the most part; we all want thing to at least have a chance to be competitive but we also want to them to be unique. Now we are just arguing discussing how to pull it off 😅

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Social Media & Community Team
1 hour ago, Mike Dee said:

Below top tier racing, the limitations aren't the vehicles it is the driver 9 times out of 10.

This is true.

Car balancing has the biggest effect on esports players. Everybody below that is pretty much not driving optimally to begin with, so no matter what car they pick there's more to give. That's why you see a little more variety in Dailies compared to Time Trial as people are just picking a car and doing a run instead of optimising their time over several months.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PJTierney said:

That's why you see a little more variety in Dailies

DS21, 240z, Manta 400 gang checking in 💪

It's honestly one of my favorite things to do; grab an under-loved car and see if I can crack top 10 with it in the dailies. The variety gives the game so much more life as you work out the quirks to each car and two runs on the same stage can be WILDLY different in how you have to attack with different cars.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Stratos won the championship 3 years in a row, the Delta scored 6 consecutive wins from '87 to '92. These cars in particular are true rally legends and the game clearly reflects that and it's fine, that's how it should be. As it was said before, most people prefer historic accuracy over artificially balanced classes.

The problem is, when these cars are created it's not immediately clear how dominant they would be compared to the other cars in the class. Once it starts showing on the leaderboards, they can't just roll out a patch and nerf them as they'd have to clear the leaderboards as well. It must be quite difficult to code the right amount of 'legend genes' into these cars without making them too OP. 

I like the challenge to take the 'underdog' and see where I can place it, also because I wouldn't take WRs with the rockets anyway :classic_happy:

Edited by richie
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mike Dee said:

DS21, 240z, Manta 400 gang checking in 💪

It's honestly one of my favorite things to do; grab an under-loved car and see if I can crack top 10 with it in the dailies. The variety gives the game so much more life as you work out the quirks to each car and two runs on the same stage can be WILDLY different in how you have to attack with different cars.

I take exactly the same approach, i know i'm far from the fastest guys out there, although i can consistently place myself in the top 10% in daylies, so i try to have fun with those underdog cars and, by doing so, i rise my own ego by saying to myself i was faster using a slow car than most of the others guys (although eons of time away from the top guys, offcourse) 😄...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"

The Stratos won the championship 3 years in a row, the Delta scored 6 consecutive wins from '87 to '92. These cars in particular are truly rally legends and the game clearly reflects that and it's fine, that's how it should be. As it was said before, most people prefer historic accuracy over artificially balanced classes.

The problem is, when these cars are created it's not immediately clear how dominant they would be compared to the other cars in the class. Once it starts showing on the leaderboards, they can't just roll out a patch and nerf them as they'd have to clear the leaderboards as well. It must be quite difficult to code the right amount of 'legend genes' into these cars without making too OP. 

I like the challenge to take the 'underdog' and see where I can place it, also because I wouldn't take WRs with the rockets anyway :classic_happy:"

 

 

exactly... Adding to that, of course the WR chasers will use the fastest car dragging all the others behind. The higher prevalence of a car in the top pages of the timetables doesn't directly correlate to the difference in times between that car and the others.... 

Edited by Opassac
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about the idea to make the faster cars more prone to getting damage and also lets say that the delta and metro getting the same kind of damage but it punishes the delta more? Have them more difficult to drive but still keep their "soul", if thats even possible? And another example is the 2000cc class, group them up in 2 with older and newer cars and allow for multiclass if the club owners want.

 

Edited by somethingthing
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dgeesi0 said:

my opinion is mine doesnt mean its right. just would prefer closer competition in car classes than what currently is. most of my fav cars have no chance of posting the top times because of it. so you end up driving faster cars just for the time differences. its great to see other peoples thoughts on this . :classic_cool:

Your opinion is as right as others, there isn't a right or wrong opinion in this matter... it's all a question of personal taste, and both ways have pros/cons and can be implemented... It's great we can all discuss these questions with the final objective of helping to improve what is already a great franchise... but... pleaseeeeeee, no BoP 😄 😄 😄

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to keep the realistic performance attributes of the cars, however there could be an option in Dailies, Clubs etc to assign the Player a random car from that Class, you might get a quick car and be under pressure, as it were, to do the performance of the car justice, or you might get a slower car and have the challenge to get it further up the leaderboard than it's performance merits.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Dunoon1956 said:

I would like to keep the realistic performance attributes of the cars, however there could be an option in Dailies, Clubs etc to assign the Player a random car from that Class, you might get a quick car and be under pressure, as it were, to do the performance of the car justice, or you might get a slower car and have the challenge to get it further up the leaderboard than it's performance merits.

I really like the idea about getting a random car assigned in community events!

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Dunoon1956 said:

I would like to keep the realistic performance attributes of the cars, however there could be an option in Dailies, Clubs etc to assign the Player a random car from that Class, you might get a quick car and be under pressure, as it were, to do the performance of the car justice, or you might get a slower car and have the challenge to get it further up the leaderboard than it's performance merits.

Another look at this, I like the idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PJTierney said:

I think multiclass and/or blacklisting particular cars in Clubs would be a solution that keeps everybody happy 🙂 

Jup, this is exactly what i ment a few posts back of me, so you can go for example go with group A + 2000cc, but without the mid/late 2000cc cars. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A decent fix would be to have multi-class events, but allow event creators to specify exactly which cars go into which class. The faster cars in H2 could mix it up with the slower cars from H3. The 6R4 could be matched up with any number of 4WD cars. The 90s Group A cars might be good up against the RGT cars. Could even let the event creator name the classes themselves. I’m copyrighting ‘RWD Deathtrap Class’

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, merseyxshore said:

A decent fix would be to have multi-class events, but allow event creators to specify exactly which cars go into which class. The faster cars in H2 could mix it up with the slower cars from H3. The 6R4 could be matched up with any number of 4WD cars. The 90s Group A cars might be good up against the RGT cars. Could even let the event creator name the classes themselves. I’m copyrighting ‘RWD Deathtrap Class’

That's exactly it, imagine creating a custom challenge class in your club for say all kinds of 2WD vehicles, so both RWD and FWD.  Would be kinda neat I think.  (just one example, but that is a real life scenario as well)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 'challenges' approach isn't one for me, but:

  • The Bugalski Challenge: "win in Spain in an F2 car vs the 4WDs"
  • The Delacour Challenge: "finish top 5 overall in Belgium in an RGT"
  • The Lukyanuk Challenge: "win in Estonia in a NR4 vs the R5s"
  • The Alen Challenge: "win a gravel round in an 037 vs the 4WD Group Bs"

 

...would make a lot of sense in the style of those McRae ones.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, merseyxshore said:

A decent fix would be to have multi-class events, but allow event creators to specify exactly which cars go into which class. The faster cars in H2 could mix it up with the slower cars from H3. The 6R4 could be matched up with any number of 4WD cars. The 90s Group A cars might be good up against the RGT cars. Could even let the event creator name the classes themselves. I’m copyrighting ‘RWD Deathtrap Class’

This is the idea I like the most so far. I like cars to behave as they did back in their days, and if they weren't particularly competitive, so be it. 

But there are more than enough cars in DR2 for some to match the performance of the slower cars in a class, and I think multiclass would bring a nice layer of complexity to the game while also being closer, in terms of times, than some "unbalanced" classes. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting comparison video of a Spanish stage.

Just great to see how close the stage is compared to the real stage. Lightning is a bit different, but that could have do with time of day. Maybe in the game a bit to yellow though.

Also quite a difference in handling. The real car is just “planted” and clean. While ingame it’s much more floaty or that asphalt is a loose surface in game with just a higher grip. Probably if there is more grip/resistance of the underground and tyres and stiffer suspension/tyres, I think it could make a major difference. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am Spanish ( I suppose you have already found out, because of how badly I speak English Xd) and Spain is very well done. CM always does a job of 10, when it comes to setting each place.

Edited by Keko55
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Keko55 said:

I am Spanish ( I suppose you have already found out, because of how badly I speak English Xd) and Spain is very well done. CM always does a job of 10, when it comes to setting each place.

Hola Tio, que dices , por favor  me salvas , estoy aqui , pegado en la Tierra de ****** con el Brexit con cielos de gris y la lluvia , siempre la lluvia , por favor da me el sol brillando. Un Saludo ,  Suerte.   Soy Ingles pero prefiero ser en Espana.

Edited by Exasperated
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think in the next few days you may see the new teaser for the next game. often around easter at big studios they leak launch new trailer for next game. on dirt twitter they said something new is coming soon.

We have 𝙖 𝙡𝙤𝙩 to show you next week for DIRT! Announcements. New stuff. Cool things. You know the drill. See you then, yeah?

 

hmm...monday at 2pm maybe ? :classic_biggrin:

 

Edited by dgeesi0
  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JorritVD said:

Funny post from a younger Craig Breen using CMR

https://www.instagram.com/p/CMm4kgxnwdK/

😄 Guy was making his own notes way back then already!   Meanwhile, I'm still making notes for DR2.0  (trollface)

 

Edit: yeah seen the Spain comparison vid(s) a long time ago, and yes, I think everyone especially CM now knows the handling needs correction.  So we're beating a bit of a dead horse on that one.

Edited by bn880
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having an issue with my screenshots on Xbox, maybe @PJTierney or someone else can help me out. Screenshots taken on Xbox used to upload automatically to Gamer DVR or Xboxreplay, but for some reason it's not the case anymore. I thought maybe some setting changed, Xbox gets tons of updates all the time, maybe privacy stuff, but couldn't find anything. Any idea?

Edited by richie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Social Media & Community Team
19 hours ago, richie said:

I'm having an issue with my screenshots on Xbox, maybe @PJTierney or someone else can help me out. Screenshots taken on Xbox used to upload automatically to Gamer DVR or Xboxreplay, but for some reason it's not the case anymore. I thought maybe some setting changed, Xbox gets tons of updates all the time, maybe privacy stuff, but couldn't find anything. Any idea?

Mine get uploaded all the time, I flex in Discord whenever I do a good Daily (Top 100).

Check your Xbox Live storage, it might be full.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2021 at 12:57 PM, dgeesi0 said:

i think in the next few days you may see the new teaser for the next game. often around easter at big studios they leak launch new trailer for next game. on dirt twitter they said something new is coming soon.

We have 𝙖 𝙡𝙤𝙩 to show you next week for DIRT! Announcements. New stuff. Cool things. You know the drill. See you then, yeah?

hmm...monday at 2pm maybe ? :classic_biggrin:

Only D5 news

OOOOOORRRRRR DiRT Rally 3 is not called "Dirt Rally 3"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you ever get 'gamed out'!?

You buy game after game, some you want, some you just think you do, and some you just shouldn't have. You get caught up in hype and seeing other people play and you forget that, at the end of the day, it's YOU that will eventually be playing the game. I've bought several titles, studied playthroughs religiously, but, then I've never played the game myself. I got rid of loads of games just recently that I realised I'd never play. Then I thought 'Well what could I play!?'. Thankfully for you guys, the answer was Dirt Rally 2.0.

I moved the game back to my main SSD, tweaked all the graphics and I've been having an absolute ball! Hooning a Mini Cooper through Scotland has been fantastic. I just wish that I could start from scratch on every country and every stage, but, thanks to Race.Net we don't get to do that. We're still haunted by PB's we set more than a year ago and could never now equal or better.

Whatever, it's made a difference to be blowing doors off instead of heads

Thanks Codies!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its good to have a break and try new things. if you only play one style of game it can get boring even if its a brand new game. do fancy a hoon around on dirt rally 2.0 myself but after reinstalling it recently only to be met with your steam sync profile isnt correct it wiped all my settings and saves. so deleted it again.

hopefully we get news this week maybe even today on the next new dirt rally title. fingers crossed. :classic_biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Social Media & Community Team

Yup, I often have a non-racing game on the go as everything I tend to play otherwise is either work or "content".

 

Right now I'm nearing 100% completion on Final Fantasy XII for the third time 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never got into the Final Fantasy series, but I have a strong feeling that I'm missing out on cool games. 

It doesn't look like we're getting any news or hints about the new DiRT Rally game today. 

Edited by richie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, richie said:

I never got into the Final Fantasy series, but I have a strong feeling that I'm missing out on cool games. 

It doesn't look like we're getting any news or hints about the new DiRT Rally game today. 

I don't want to say it's an acquired taste, but personally I kind of think the ship has sailed and you're either already on the FF hype train or you're just into other games. They are fantastic games, but I grew up playing them so I also don't know if it is half nostalgia keeping me so entertained by them and their very very Japanese game style and battle system. You either love it or hate it in my experience.

But damn... that FF hair looks so good 😍

Edited by Mike Dee
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mike Dee said:

I don't want to say it's an acquired taste, but personally I kind of think the ship has sailed and you're either already on the FF hype train or you're just into other games. They are fantastic games, but I grew up playing them so I also don't know if it is half nostalgia keeping me so entertained by them and their very very Japanese game style and battle system. You either love it or hate it in my experience.

But damn... that FF hair looks so good 😍

I'll definitely get one at some point, but not sure which one. I'll probably start with one of the first games that came out on Xbox One. I think it's safe to say that this series has reached cult status so I'm really curious. I think I'm going to like it. It was the same with the Metal Gear Solid series, never played the games. Then Metal Gear Solid V: PP was free on Xbox and the story sucked me in like a vortex, it was intense. That game hit me like a freight train emotionally, never felt anything like that before with a video game. 

PJ once posted a FF scene on twitter where the main characters were sitting around a camp fire, probably after an important battle. The energy in that scene made it clear to me that I'll like that kind of game. 

Edited by richie
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd see something new, or sometimes old, think it looked good, only to rage uninstall it when there was something that kept frustrating me. I had Metal Gear V, then played other military games and realised that I sucked at stealth, so in the bin it went. Luckily, the vast majority of the titles I got rid of were ones I'd got in Steam sales, so I didn't feel like I'd lost too much money.

I enjoyed Horizon Zero Dawn, but got horrendous blisters on my fingers from firing the arrows. I also worked my way through several COD titles, but, the campaigns were over way too soon and then the focus was on multiplayer which has never interested me. The most recent title I enjoyed was Ghost Recon: Breakpoint, but, it was the open world more than the missions that kept me coming back. Year 2 is imminent, but, I don't think it'll offer me much.

I was surprised how quickly I picked up DR again and was having fun even when crashing horrifically. Every Codies rally title I've played has had that, you don't mind crashing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, richie said:

That game hit me like a freight train emotionally, never felt anything like that before with a video game.

Really? From the weakest of the series?

 

5 hours ago, Rogerbee said:

I had Metal Gear V, then played other military games and realised that I sucked at stealth, so in the bin it went.

It's a good thing MGS also excels at combat gameplay, but whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MGS, right from its earliest incarnations, never appealed to me for some reason, I got it when it was on sale and I saw someone a lot better than me play it. That's the thing with playthroughs, it's always someone better than you are playing it. When you try you find you're hopeless! For some reason, I didn't totally suck at Colin McRae rally games, so when DR 2.0 came along it took me right back to those glory days, particularly when you finally got Colin's Scooby.

Edited by Rogerbee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Social Media & Community Team
9 hours ago, JZStudios said:

It's a good thing MGS also excels at combat gameplay, but whatever.

The controls and mechanics of Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain are so solid they're the high benchmark of any open-world game I consider playing now.

 

Fun fact: I worked at Konami during the years of that game's release, even have a full-size replica arm on my desk as I type this.

MGSV goodies at TGS 2014: prosthetic arm replica, sneaking suit Snake  figure and more | Metal gear solid, Metal gear, Metal

 

I also wrote my University Thesis on the metanarrative of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty 🙂 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PJTierney said:

The controls and mechanics of Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain are so solid they're the high benchmark of any open-world game I consider playing now.

 

Fun fact: I worked at Konami during the years of that game's release, even have a full-size replica arm on my desk as I type this.

MGSV goodies at TGS 2014: prosthetic arm replica, sneaking suit Snake  figure and more | Metal gear solid, Metal gear, Metal

 

I also wrote my University Thesis on the metanarrative of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty 🙂 

All of the above is most cool @PJTierney. The MGS series is one of, if not my most, beloved game series. 

It clearly has rough edges (and a messy end), but I think MGS V is an incredible game. Each title in the series has a different appeal though, even MGS2 which I was disappointed with at the time but have warmed to over the years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, JZStudios said:

Really? From the weakest of the series?

 

 

As it was the first MGS I played I had no comparison. I think I just didn't expect the game to have such an effect on me. During the opening scene at the hospital I was thinking 'ok, this is strange, I give this game half an hour max to get interesting'. I had no idea what the man on fire and the floating muppet would be, I kept playing and then Quiet appeared. I didn't kill her at the ruins and it turned out she was a fascinating character. During the whole game I was wondering what she was humming all the time. The story was like a crescendo that culminated in that song. I was confused, and dead :classic_laugh: Later I found out Quiet was inspired by a real person, Stefanie Joosten. She's incredible. Probably the sweetest thing you'll find in a video game. That wasn't the last MGS I played for sure. 

Anyway, we dragged this a bit off-topic. Are we getting any news on the new DiRT Rally soon™?

Edited by richie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to DiRTy Gossip
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...